- Not-for-profit
- Plans include: 401(k) and defned benefit
- Bundled recordkeeping
- 260 employees
- Client since 2006
- Client utilized same bundled provider for nearly 20 years
- Client relied on the recordkeeping vendor for all oversight
- No benchmarking done regarding fees or performance
- No knowledge of specific liabilities under multiple employer DB plan
- Employee education was provided sporadically by the vendor
- 401(k) Plan inadvertently emphasized investment in after tax contribution
- 401(k) Plan design was harmful to participation, testing and administration
- No formal review of investments offered in either plan
- Numerous testing issues
- Participant asset allocation was skewed to one investment option
- Lack of support from incumbent provider
- Conduct a complete fee analysis of funds and administrative cost
- Identify favorable plan design changes
- Reduce 401(k) plan level costs
- Draft and implement investment policy statement
- Lead education campaign for home office personnel and employees
- With legal counsel implemented Plan design changes that helped reduce workload and improved discrimination testing results
- Initial negotiations with bundled 401(k) provider resulted in immediate savings of $60k in annual ongoing fees and increased rate on fixed rate investment
- Created and implemented an investment policy statement
- Trained Client's staff & officers to enhance understanding of administration and investment oversight
- Oversaw subsequent RFP for 401(k) that resulted in a significantly lower cost investment menu for participants with complete fee transaparency
- Oversaw change in market value adjustment formula that took a substantial exit penalty and turned it into a bonus payout
- Conducted multiple rounds of employee education to boost general investment knowledge & awareness of asset allocation strategies (dramatically reducing reliance on the one fund previously utilized most by participants)
- Benchmarked previously unknown liability under multiple employer DB and determined exit terms should the Client wish to pursue that option
Client A Case Study Client B Case Study Client C Case Study
|